Comparison
SolvSolar vs Sitemark
Drone analytics for asset inspection rather than sales proposals. SolvSolar replaces it with a $0-seat Solar Operating System that designs, prices, finances and closes in 45 seconds — on web, WhatsApp and Telegram.
Price in real currency
Sitemark: Enterprise contract, typically ₹4,00,000+ a year, plus drone operations
SolvSolar: ₹0 per seat, ₹10 per kW designed — first 100 kW free
Proposal turnaround
Sitemark: Days
SolvSolar: 45 seconds, end to end
India regulatory fit
Sitemark: Limited / US-only
SolvSolar: Global DISCOM & net-metering rulesets
SolvSolar differs from Sitemark because Sitemark charges Enterprise quote (Enterprise contract, typically ₹4,00,000+ a year, plus drone operations), while SolvSolar charges ₹0 per seat, ₹10 per kW designed — first 100 kW free with no per-seat licence. The second measurable difference is turnaround: Sitemark typically needs Days to produce a proposal, against 45 seconds, end to end on SolvSolar. On India-specific compliance, Sitemark provides Limited / US-only, whereas SolvSolar provides Global DISCOM & net-metering rulesets.
| Capability | Sitemark | SolvSolar OS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per seat | Enterprise quote | $0 / seat — pay per kW designed |
| Cost in INR | Enterprise contract, typically ₹4,00,000+ a year, plus drone operations | ₹0 per seat, ₹10 per kW designed — first 100 kW free |
| Proposal turnaround | Days | 45 seconds, end to end |
| Mobile speed | Drone + web | Mobile-first PWA, sub-second loads |
| WhatsApp integration | Not supported | Native WhatsApp + Telegram bots |
| Global DISCOM / net metering | Limited / US-only | Global DISCOM & net-metering rulesets |
5 concrete differences between SolvSolar and Sitemark
- Sitemark inspects plants that already exist (thermal defect detection, O&M analytics); SolvSolar sells plants that do not exist yet.
- Sitemark turnaround is measured in days per site; SolvSolar's is about 45 seconds per proposal.
- Sitemark is a ₹4 lakh-class annual enterprise contract plus drone operations; SolvSolar is ₹0 per seat with pay-per-kW usage.
- SolvSolar carries PM Surya Ghar, DISCOM net metering and GST logic; Sitemark carries none of it.
- SolvSolar output is a customer-signable proposal; Sitemark output is an inspection report.
SolvSolar vs Sitemark: which is better for Indian installers?
SolvSolar vs Sitemark: which is better for Indian installers? They sit at opposite ends of the asset lifecycle. Sitemark is aerial inspection and O&M analytics for operating plants — thermal anomaly detection across a large portfolio is real value if you manage one, and the enterprise pricing reflects that audience. It has nothing to say about winning a rooftop customer: no price, no subsidy, no proposal, and a turnaround measured in days. SolvSolar is the front of the funnel — design, BOM, PM Surya Ghar subsidy, payback, EMI and a signable PDF in about 45 seconds for ₹0 per seat. If you are still growing your order book rather than maintaining megawatts, SolvSolar is the tool to buy first.
Related reading
Before you switch tools, read the Solar Proposal Software Buyer's Guide for India (2026) for the full evaluation framework, check the exact PM Surya Ghar subsidy slabs that Sitemark does not compute for you, and compare the payback numbers in Solar ROI benchmarks by system size. Our own numbers are published in full on the pricing page, and state-level rules live on the Maharashtra and Gujarat DISCOM guides.
Migrate from Sitemark in 60 seconds
Import your panel and inverter catalogue, keep your pricing, and issue your first SolvSolar proposal on the 100 kW free trial — no card, no per-seat fees.